Showing posts with label Firstpost World Latest News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Firstpost World Latest News. Show all posts

Thursday, 5 November 2020

When might we learn US Election 2020 Results? Here's a state-by-state estimate

As of 6 pm Eastern Time on Thursday (4.30 am on Friday IST), six states that will decide the next president remained uncalled, as did a handful of Senate races that will determine who controls the chamber.

Here’s where things stand on Day Three, when you can expect final results and how to follow along as this extraordinary election unfolds.

What are we waiting for?

In the presidential race, as of 6 pm ET (4.30 am IST), we did not yet know who won Alaska (three electoral votes), Arizona (11), Georgia (16), Nevada (six), North Carolina (15) or Pennsylvania (20).

With the three calls made on Wednesday — Michigan and Wisconsin for Joe Biden, and Maine’s 2nd Congressional District for President Donald Trump — Biden has 253 confirmed electoral votes and would need 17 more to win. Trump has 214 confirmed electoral votes and would need 56 more to win.

Four Senate races were uncalled in three states: Alaska, Georgia and North Carolina. Two other races were called Wednesday: The Republican incumbent in Maine, Senator Susan Collins, and the Democratic incumbent in Michigan, Senator Gary Peters, both won re-election.

Georgia has two races involving Republican incumbents whom Democrats hope to unseat. One, between Senator David Perdue and Jon Ossoff, is very likely to go to a runoff in January. The other race will definitely require a runoff between the incumbent, Kelly Loeffler, and Raphael Warnock, a Democrat.

When will we know the results?

This will probably vary significantly from state to state. Let’s take them one at a time.

Alaska

Alaska may well be the last state to be called because officials there won’t even begin counting mail ballots or early in-person ballots cast after 29 October for another week. That being said, it’s a red state and isn’t really competitive. Trump will probably win here pretty easily, and Senator Dan Sullivan, a Republican, probably will, too.

Arizona

Arizona could be called on Thursday, but probably not until late in the day. Biden is leading by a little more than two percentage points with about 86 percent of the estimated vote counted, and some news outlets, including The Associated Press and Fox News, have already called it for him. The New York Times and others have not done so.

Officials in Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix and where many votes are still uncounted, said they would release an update on the results after 9 pm ET (7.30 am IST).

Georgia

Elections officials in Georgia said they would keep counting votes throughout Thursday.

The state might have been called already if not for a burst pipe at a site in Fulton County where election officials were counting absentee ballots, which delayed the counting process in and around Atlanta.

Trump was ahead in Georgia by less than half a percentage point with 98 percent of the estimated vote counted, but Biden has been closing the gap, and the uncounted ballots are mostly in Democratic areas. The race could end up close enough for a recount.

Nevada

Biden has a slim lead in Nevada, and he expanded it slightly after more results were released on Thursday. The race is much closer than experts expected going in, and the state will accept mail ballots received through 10 November as long as they were postmarked by Election Day.

The state was not expected to release more results on Thursday.

North Carolina

Trump is narrowly ahead in North Carolina with 95 percent of estimated votes counted. But North Carolina will accept mail-in ballots that arrive through 12 November, and it’s possible that the race won’t be called until then.

Pennsylvania

There are a lot of uncounted votes in major metropolitan areas of Pennsylvania — mostly in Philadelphia, but some in Pittsburgh too — and while Trump remains ahead by a little under two percentage points, Biden has been steadily making up ground. The vote tally is being continually updated.

The Trump campaign is also fiercely contesting Pennsylvania ballots in the courts, which could drag the process out.

Maggie Astor c.2020 The New York Times Company



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3p5cFme
via IFTTT

Saturday, 31 October 2020

Boris Johnson declares England’s second stay-at-home lockdown from 5 November for four weeks

London: UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has announced a second stay-at-home lockdown across England, starting from next Thursday and to run for four weeks until at least the start of December, in order to deal with the rapidly increasing coronavirus infections.

Addressing a briefing from 10 Downing Street on Saturday, Johnson said there was no choice but to be “humble in the face of nature" and unless tough action is taken now the peak of mortality in the country could be even greater than the first wave triggering a “medical and moral disaster”.

The new England-wide measures will lapse by 2 December and, unless a further intervention happens in the meantime, England will revert to the current three-tier localised lockdown system.

“Now is the time to take action because there is no alternative," said Johnson.

"You must stay at home, you must only leave home for education, work if you cannot work from home, recreational exercise with one person from another household or your household, and to escape injury or harm, to shop for food and essentials or provide care for vulnerable people as a volunteer," he said, adding that this lockdown would be less "restrictive" than the first lockdown of earlier this year.

He also confirmed an extension to the furlough scheme until December, the wage support scheme for businesses which was set to end from 1 November.

Non-essential shops and leisure and hospitality venues, such as restaurants, bars and pubs, will be required to close down.

Takeaways will be allowed to stay open and people can only meet one person from outside their household outdoors.

Unlike the first complete lockdown in March, schools, colleges and universities will be allowed to stay open.

Johnson also indicated that he “sincerely” hopes that the restrictions can be lifted enough for families to come together in time for Christmas but set no further details around that.

“I am very optimistic that this will feel better by next spring,” he said, indicating no significant changes are to be expected until early 2021.

The latest lockdown plans will be tabled in Parliament next week for a debate and vote by Wednesday, for them to come in effect from Thursday.

At the Downing Street briefing, Johnson was joined by England's Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty, and the government's Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance.

“Across virtually the entire country, the rate of increase is on rapid increase,” said Whitty, as he presented maps of the latest coronavirus spread across England.

“Perhaps half a million people or more are with infections, based on different models… in terms of death rates, there is potential for things to be twice as bad as the first wave,” noted Vallance, as he described the situation as a “very grim picture”.

The devolved administrations of the United Kingdom will continue to follow their own already strict lockdown policies, calling on residents to refrain from non-essential travels to and from England.

Wales is currently in a “firebreak” lockdown which is due to be in place until 9 November and Scotland’s stringent four-tier system, with Tier 4 akin to a complete shutdown, is set to come into force from Monday.

Northern Ireland, meanwhile, has been in complete lockdown since the middle of October, scheduled for a month.

Earlier on Saturday, several media reports had indicated plans for the month-long lockdown were afoot after Johnson met his most senior Cabinet colleagues on Friday to discuss the possible toughening of restrictions in light of worsening coronavirus infection rate and hospital cases.

Downing Street moved to bring forward the prime minister's announcement, initially planned for Monday, in the wake of the leaked media reports.

Meanwhile, the UK recorded another 21,915 confirmed coronavirus cases on Saturday, bringing the total since the pandemic began to 1,011,660.

Another 326 people were reported to have died within 28 days of a positive test this weekend, taking its death toll past 46,500.

Documents from the government's Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPI-M-O) revealed this week that England has breached its "reasonable worst-case" scenario for COVID-19 infections and hospital admissions for the winter months.

The scientists warned that the number of daily coronavirus deaths in England is in line with that scenario, but "is almost certain to exceed this within the next two weeks".

Infection rates are currently soaring across much of Europe, prompting new forms of lockdown across Germany, France and Belgium.

The Opposition Labour Party accused the UK government of “dithering” over the issue of what has previously been described as a short “circuit-breaker” complete lockdown.

“We could have saved more of the economy and reduced the impact of [lockdown] with a shorter, earlier circuit-breaker that coincided with half term,” said Labour’s shadow business minister Lucy Powell.

Scientific advisers at the top of government believe it is now too late for a two-week national circuit-breaker to have enough of an effect and a longer national lockdown is needed to drive the reproduction number, or R value, of the virus below one.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2Jhgwfg
via IFTTT

Thursday, 29 October 2020

US Election 2020 Key Issues: Racial justice, racism and where Trump and Biden stand

Apart from the extensive damage brought about by the coronavirus pandemic, election year 2020 also laid bare political conflicts along deep social cleavages in the United States, made apparent by the eruption of protests across the country demanding racial justice.

For instance, the killing of an unarmed Black man, George Floyd, by a White policeman, Derek Chauvin in May sparked off protests and civil unrest in Minneapolis, before spreading nationwide and eventually all around the world in the form of Black Lives Matters protests. While the majority of these protests demanding racial justice remained peaceful, demonstrations in some American cities escalated to violence and rioting. Following this, the subject of race predictably made it into campaign speeches and poll promises in the presidential race.

The two main candidates in the 2020 election, President Donald Trump and former vice-president Joe Biden, reacted differently to these events. Trump urged crackdown on violent protests and asked governors to “dominate” in order to avoid looking “like a bunch of jerks”, drawing criticism for stoking racial tension at a time the president should be uniting the nation. Biden, on the other hand, echoed Floyd’s last words and sympathised with the protestors, releasing several video messages calling for action on racial inequality.

This has translated into the two presidential candidates adopting distinct approaches on countering racism.

Where Trump stands

The president has stayed away from outlining a policy plan to tackle and lower racial inequality. He has dismissed the idea that systemic racism exists in the United States.

Trump insists that his administration’s policies have helped Black Americans, citing record low Black unemployment figures. “Unemployment for Black Americans is the lowest ever recorded. Trump approval ratings with Black Americans has doubled. Thank you, and it will get even (much) better,” he tweeted in 2018, and has repeated similar claims this election year. He went on to suggest that these lower unemployment rates will help bring racial justice.

These claims by Trump have been subsequently shown to be exaggerated. Much of the progress on Black unemployment rate in the United States was made during the Obama administration.

In June, the president outlined a four-point plan to address aspects of racial inequality and to “build safety, opportunity and dignity.” This new plan seeks to increase federal support for small business owners from minority communities and confront racial disparities in healthcare, among other goals.

"Americans are good and virtuous people. We have to work together to confront bigotry and prejudice wherever they appear. But we'll make no progress and heal no wounds by falsely labelling tens of millions of decent Americans as racist or bigots," Trump said.

Where Biden stands

In contrast, Biden’s promises towards racial justice are far more comprehensive, at least on paper. In August, the former vice-president said he is running for president this year to ease the racial divisions in the country, and to restore “the soul of America”.

Biden plans to invest over $50 billion in venture capital to Black and Brown entrepreneurs, and “expand access” to $100 billion in business loans by funding state, local, tribal and non-profit lending programmes in Black and Brown communities. Overall, he promises to leverage more than $150 billion for small businesses that have been “structurally excluded for generations”.

He also wishes to encourage private equity investment in Black and Brown-owned businesses by expanding the New Markets Tax Credit to $5 billion annually and making it permanent.

On police reforms and the criminal justice system, Biden’s website says that of all the people incarcerated in the United States, “too many are black and brown”. He plans to make the criminal justice system rid itself of “racial, gender, and income-based disparities”, but stops short of outlining how he would go about it.

On education reforms, Biden promises to support minority-serving institutions and historically Black colleges and universities that play a “unique and vital role in their communities”. He plans to invest $10 billion to improve enrolment, retention, completion and employment rates at these institutions. Biden also plans to expand efforts towards student loan forgiveness, a move that is expected to especially benefit Black students.

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Browse other key issues that could decide the US Election here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/35Jwt5y
via IFTTT

US Election 2020 Key Issues: Environment, climate change and where Trump and Biden stand

United States presidential nominees for 2020 Donald Trump and Joe Biden couldn’t be further apart on their commitment towards and plans for the environment. The two candidates sharply oppose each other on a number of environmental issues, including climate policy, fossil fuel regulations, renewable energy, emission standards and wildlife conservation, as this piece will show.

However, the subject does not hold the same value for the two: While “climate and energy” appears at the top of Biden’s plans on his official website, there is no explicit mention of the environment or allied issues in Trump’s agenda. This has not stopped the two candidates from bringing up the subject of environment and climate policy in rallies and debates.

Where Trump stands

The president, instead of addressing an environmental crisis or the need for stricter regulations on industries, weds the subject of environment with jobs. He insists that clean water and air are his priorities, but also promises to boost the country’s production of oil and natural gas and promote employment there — objectives that might come in each other’s way.

His words at a recent speech in Florida paints a clearer picture. “My administration is proving every day that we can improve our environment while creating millions of high-paying jobs... Instead of focusing on radical ideology, my administration is focused on delivering real results, and that’s what we have. And we right now have the cleanest air we’ve ever had in this country, let’s say over the last 40 years because I assume 200 years ago is probably better,” Trump said.

In terms of environment policy, the president has significantly weakened regulations on methane, mercury and uranium. This is expected to have a direct, swift and negative impact on the country’s air and water quality. Trump supports an unobstructed growth of the fossil fuel industry and pushes for unrestricted fracking.

In August last year, Trump diluted the Endangered Species Act, one of United States’ most effective environmental laws brought in by former president Richard Nixon in 1973. It is credited with saving several iconic species including the bald eagle, the national bird of the United States. Trump also rolled back regulations on fishing and hunting.

Most significantly, Trump pulled the United States out of the Paris Agreement on climate change, an international deal signed by almost every country. He also rolled back several Obama-era rules on emissions and has refused to factor climate change in his administration’s policy decisions.

Where Biden stands

Unlike Trump, Biden repeatedly stresses how climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing the planet today. “Climate change is the existential challenge that will define our future as a country,” he tweeted. Biden promises to recommit the United States to the Paris Agreement on climate change, in addition to leading “an effort to get every major country to ramp up the ambition of their domestic climate targets”.

Biden says his administration will ensure the United States achieves a 100 percent clean energy economy and reaches net-zero emissions by 2050. This, he says, will be achieved by ensuring that polluting industries “bear the full cost of the carbon pollution they are emitting”.

If elected, Biden proposed to invest $1.7 trillion over the next ten years into clean energy and environmental justice, in addition to leveraging an addition $5 trillion from the private sector and local investments.

Biden also promises to create a million new jobs in the auto industry to accelerate production of electric vehicles, achieve a carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035, and construct 1.5 million sustainable homes and housing units.

The former vice-president has plans to create 2,50,000 jobs in plugging abandoned oil and natural gas wells and reclaiming abandoned coal, hardrock, and uranium mines, in sharp contrast to Trump’s policies on coal and uranium. Biden has also promised to focus on environmental justice, by establishing an Environmental and Climate Justice Division within the United States Department of Justice.

In all of this, Biden does not want to be seen as forgetting about the workers involved in the fossil fuel industry. Calling them critical to “decades of economic growth”, Biden says his administration will “secure the benefits coal miners and their families have earned”.

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Browse other key issues that could decide the US Election here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2TB2jMd
via IFTTT

US Election 2020 Key Issues: COVID-19, healthcare and where Trump and Biden stand

As of 26 October, the United States continues to record the world’s highest number of COVID-19 cases at over 86 lakh, and the world’s highest COVID-19-related deaths at over 2.25 lakh. Although President Donald Trump has cited several reasons for the situation in his country (including pushing conspiracy theories), and has insisted repeatedly that the pandemic is “going away”, the issue has taken centre stage in this year’s presidential debates. In the final presidential debate in Tennessee this year, Trump said “we’re learning to live with” the coronavirus. Democratic nominee Joe Biden interrupted the president and said, “We’re learning to die with it”.

Biden and Trump also disagree fundamentally on broader issues of healthcare in America. The main bone of contention between the two candidates has to do with the degree of the federal government’s involvement in citizens’ healthcare issues; while Trump wants to reduce the national government’s role, Biden plans to expand it. This has a direct effect on health insurance coverage, medicine prices and the Affordable Care Act.

Where Trump stands

President Trump, who tested positive for COVID-19 earlier in October, has squarely and consistently blamed China for the coronavirus outbreak, although he recently hinted at taking responsibility for the situation in the United States. However, he is fighting the election on the basis of what he says he achieved towards minimising the damage.

In terms of policy, Trump established a White House Coronavirus Task Force which “coordinates and oversees the administration’s efforts to monitor, prevent, contain, and mitigate the spread of the virus”. A Coronavirus Global Response Coordination Unit was also set up to coordinate international action through diplomatic and economic channels. In addition to these, Operation Warp Speed was set up to “produce and deliver 300 million doses” of effective vaccines by January 2021. In an unprecedented move, Trump also halted funding and pulled out of the World Health Organisation this year over the institution’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic.

However, when it comes to the specifics of the coronavirus response such as contact tracing, devising institutional restrictions and acquisition of key medical equipment, the Trump administration has palmed off the responsibility to the states.

Among other healthcare issues, Trump has sought to repeal the Affordable Care Act and replace it with a better alternative since the day he took office, but has been unable to achieve either so far. Among many critical provisions, Barack Obama’s signature healthcare Act protects citizens with pre-existing conditions from being denied health coverage. Although Trump has promised to keep this part of the law, he is yet to explain how. This is significant as the number of Americans without medical insurance continues to rise.

When it comes to Medicare (the federal programme for people over 65) and Medicaid (the health programme for low-income households and people with disabilities), Trump has sought to reduce drug prices and provide private plan alternatives to Medicare beneficiaries while supporting spending caps for those under Medicaid.

Where Biden stands

From wearing masks at every public gathering to reiterating that he will follow “scientific advice” while designing policy, Biden has made an effort to be seen as far away from Trump’s stand on COVID-19 as possible, painting the president as a clueless leader who does not care. While healthcare in general has been at the top of Biden’s agenda, the former vice-president has ensured in his rallies that the focus does not shift away from Trump’s handling of the pandemic.

Biden has proposed a seven-point plan to deal with the coronavirus in the United States if elected. This includes vastly improved testing capacity, ramping up production of personal protective equipment (PPE), investing $25 billion in a vaccine plan to guarantee every American access to free COVID-19 vaccines, and establishing a COVID-19 Racial and Ethnic Disparities Task Force. Biden has also promised to implement a national mask mandate and “immediately restore” United States’ relationship with the World Health Organisation.

On the Affordable Care Act, Biden has proposed further bolstering the health insurance law by expanding federal subsidies and implementing a plan which will insure “an estimated 97 percent of Americans”. He has also proposed lowering the age of eligibility under Medicare from 65 to 60, in addition to creating a new federal health insurance programme like Medicare, which he said would be a public option. The two presidential candidates agree on the need to bring down prescription drug prices and end surprise billing at health facilities. Biden promises to do away with the existing laws that prevent Medicare from negotiating lower prices with drug corporations.

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Browse other key issues that could decide the US Election here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/35PZPPE
via IFTTT

Tuesday, 27 October 2020

US Election 2020 Minnesota profile: How state voted in 2016, demographics and more

Year of entry into union: 1858

Capital: Saint Paul

Total electors: Ten.

In 2016, the Minnesota electors voted for Hillary Clinton for president and Tim Kaine for vice-president.

How Minnesota votes: Blue. With the exception of 1972, Minnesota has voted Democrat in every United States presidential election in the last 60 years.

Demographic breakdown: 85.3 percent White, 5.2 percent African-American and four percent Asian-American.

Fun fact: Minnesotans have voted for the Democratic candidate every presidential election since 1976. This is more times consecutively than any state outside of the south. This is also the longest running streak for the Democratic Party in any state (not counting District of Columbia).

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of other US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2HEgVIc
via IFTTT

US Election 2020 Mississippi profile: How state voted in 2016, demographics and more

Year of entry into union: 1817

Capital: Jackson

Total electors: Six.

In 2016, the six electors voted for Donald Trump for president and Mike Pence for vice-president.

How Mississippi votes: Red. Mississippi has voted for the Republican candidate in every presidential election since 1980.

Demographic breakdown: 59.1 percent White and 37 percent African-American.

Fun fact: For 116 years, from 1876 to 1992, the Democratic Party politically dominated the state of Mississippi. In that period, the state elected only Democratic governors and federal representatives. Today, Mississippi is considered a Red state with a Republican governor and leaning towards Republican presidential candidates.

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of other US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3kvm83n
via IFTTT

US Election 2020 Massachusetts profile: How state voted in 2016, demographics and more

Year of entry into union: 1788

Capital: Boston

Total electors: Eleven.

In 2016, they pledged to vote for Hillary Clinton for president and Tim Kaine for vice-president.

How Massachusetts votes: Blue. Massachusetts has voted for the Democratic Party in every presidential election since 1988.

Demographic breakdown: 81.3 percent White, 8.8 percent African-American and 6.9 percent Asian-American.

Fun fact: In 1972, Massachusetts was the only state in the country that did not vote for incumbent president Richard Nixon, and instead voted for the Democratic nominee George McGovern. Two years later in 1974, Nixon resigned as president amid the Watergate scandal.

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of other US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2Tv9pBV
via IFTTT

US Election 2020 Maryland profile: How state voted in 2016, demographics and more

Year of entry into union: 1788

Capital: Annapolis

Total electors: Ten.

In 2016, all 10 electors pledged to vote for Hillary Clinton for president and Tim Kaine for vice-president.

How Maryland votes: Blue.Like Maine, Maryland has voted Democrat in every election since 1992.

Demographic breakdown: 56.19 percent White, 29.78 percent African-American and 6.23 percent Asian-American.

Fun fact: President Donald Trump and Maryland governor Larry Hogan have been engaged in a bitter fight over the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trump in a national address criticised Hogan and said he “didn't really understand too much about what was going on.” Months later, on being infected by the coronavirus, Trump was admitted to a hospital in Maryland.

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of other US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3ozLnnp
via IFTTT

US Election 2020 Maine profile: How state voted in 2016, demographics and more

Year of entry into union: 1820

Capital: Augusta

Total electors: Four.

In 2016, three of them pledged to vote for Democratic nominees Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine, while one — Richard Bennett — pledged to vote for Republican candidates Donald Trump and Mike Pence.

How Maine votes: Blue. Maine has voted for the Democratic Party in all presidential elections since 1992.

Demographic breakdown: 94.8 percent White and 1.2 percent African-American.

Fun fact: In 2016, Maine split its electoral vote for the first time in its history, giving one of its four votes to Republican candidate Donald Trump. Such a split is allowed in no other state except Nebraska.

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of other US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3oylnsH
via IFTTT

US Election 2020 Louisiana profile: How state voted in 2016, demographics and more

Year of entry into union: 1812

Capital: Baton Rouge

Total electors: Eight.

In 2016, all eight electors pledged to vote for Donald Trump for president and Mike Pence for vice-president.

How Louisiana votes: Red. Like Kentucky, Louisiana has voted Republican in the last five presidential elections.

Demographic breakdown: 65.39 percent White and 32.94 percent African-American

Fun fact: Hurricane Katrina played a key role in shifting Louisiana’s political leaning. The natural disaster heavily affected the state, and strongly Democratic New Orleans lost and displaced a significant fraction of its population. This reduced the Democrats’ overall support base in Louisiana and eventually pushed it in the favour of the Republicans.

Follow all the latest news from US Election 2020 here

Brush up on how the US elects its president and vice-president here

Read profiles of other US states here



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3e0KaRt
via IFTTT

Tuesday, 20 October 2020

Donald Trump slams Anthony Fauci on COVID-19: Will president's misguided ploy cost him second term?

President Donald Trump is angry.

Just two weeks before election day, the president is lashing out: At the "fake news" press, at the "rigged" polls, at Attorney-General William Barr for refusing to indict his opponent and, most of all, at Dr Anthony Fauci and "all these idiots".

With the US toll due to the coronavirus around 221,000 and time running out to set right his faltering campaign, an under pressure Trump seems to have made the calculation of trying to cast Fauci, a man who has served six presidents, as the villain of the piece while claiming that the public is "tired" about hearing about the coronavirus.

It is, to put it kindly, an interesting strategy.

To put it bluntly, it looks like a misguided ploy that may end up costing him a second term.

If the polls are proven right on 3 November and the Democratic challenger Joe Biden defeats Trump, many might look back and wonder if this was the moment when the incumbent threw away his last shot.

While this isn't the first time Trump has sought to portray Fauci in a negative light — his constant attacks have caused Fauci and his family to require security details after receiving death threats — what has to be baffling Republican operatives and party members is Trump choosing this moment to bring attention to the US' failure, and by extension Trump's failure, to properly address the coronavirus pandemic.

“He’s been here for 500 years,” the president said of the good doctor in a campaign call with staff, as per The New York Times. “Every time he goes on television, there’s always a bomb, but there’s a bigger bomb if you fire him. This guy’s a disaster.”

This, even as Fauci has warned Americans to “hunker down” and brace for a difficult winter and increasingly sought to distance himself from the White House's relentlessly optimistic view that the nation is “rounding the corner” on the pandemic.

What makes it worse for Trump is that Fauci, in the eyes of the public, is far more trusted and popular than he, the sitting president.

A poll released late last month by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan group, found that 68 percent of Americans trusted Fauci "either a great deal or a fair amount" to provide reliable information about the virus, while only 40 percent trusted Trump.

Further, a July 2020 survey by Quinnipiac University Poll discovered that two-thirds of respondents don't trust to give information on the coronavirus and that two-thirds trust Fauci to do the same.

Even for a man who enjoys rolling the dice — and not just because he's owned casinos — attacking Fauci in such a manner is rife with risk, standing as it does in stark contrast to how he won the Oval Office in the first place.

Trump was blessed as he was to have Hillary Clinton, a candidate who was extremely well-defined for better and worse, with the second highest unfavourable rating in history, as his main opposition. Clinton's candidacy allowed Trump to run as 'an outsider' and rail against the establishment.

The problem now is, that Trump is the establishment and the two men he's now running against, Biden and Fauci, are more popular in the general public than he will ever be.

And of all the major issues Trump trails Biden in in the eyes of voters, perhaps no subject stands out more than the coronavirus: registered voters give Biden an  astounding 12 point edge over Trump when it comes to who they think would be capable of handling the pandemic.

Trump may be delighting his die-hard fans, who can't get enough of him bashing his enemies (both real and perceived), but this ploy is unlikely to play well with women and swing voters. Suburban women, in particular, are stampeding away from Trump and the Republican party.

And data shows that Biden, for the first time, is winning over senior citizens, which, along with whites, make up the core of the Republican base.

Seniors also vote. A lot. And while some of them were happy to go along with the president's claims that the coronavirus is a hoax, they had a change of tune once the president himself was hospitalised.

Given these particular set of facts, Trump's strategy of attacking a widely popular figure and continuing to shine a light on his biggest blunder as president makes no sense. Which op-ed writers across America are pointing out.

'Makes no sense'

CNN's Chris Cillizza began his column by calling out those that still believe that Trump is some sort of political savant.

In his column entitled 'Attacking Anthony Fauci is Donald Trump's dumbest closing message', Cillizza wrote, "It's hard to imagine something dumber than attacking Fauci as a closing message for a campaign that badly needs to rebuild its credibility with voters, especially women, on the issue of the coronavirus."

Cillizza added that Trump's attacks on Fauci, seen through the lens of a winning strategy, make no sense. That Fauci is the one person in America Trump shouldn't attack if he wants to win the election.

"And yet he does it anyway. Partially because he can't help himself. And partially because Trump has ever only been good at one thing: Playing to what his base wants," Cillizza concluded.

Over at the Washington Post, Aaron Blake, in an editorial entitled 'Trump's attack on Fauci makes no sense', pointed out that Trump's claim that America would have seen 800,000 deaths were Fauci in charge has 'no basis in reality'.

"Fauci has quite clearly advocated for more mitigation than Trump has, not less. It would logically follow that, whatever negative impact Fauci’s advice might have on the economy, it would at least have reduced mortality, relative to what we’ve seen so far," Blake wrote.

Blake added that Trump is trying to have his rhetorical cake and eat it too by saying that Fauci and his fellow scientists would have both depressed the economy and led to more death. "It’s just not an argument that makes sense," Blake concluded.

Stephanie Sarkis, writing in Forbes, doesn't hold back while painting Trump as a green-eyed figure.

"Trump, like many narcissists, views anyone that has a different opinion than him as being “disloyal.” Narcissists require loyalty, but rarely do they give it in return. Time and time again, Trump has shown that when anyone dares to disagree with him or enable his behavior, he tries to destroy them," Sarkis writes.

Sarkis pointed to the Trump administration repeatedly undermining Fauci: from compiling a list of items they feel he's been wrong about and handing it out to reporters to writing an op-ed in USA Today so riddled with falsehoods that the publication had to state that the article did not meet its standards and repeatedly leaving him out of coronavirus briefings.

"Trump hates being criticised, and he hates when someone refutes his statements. He has decided to go after Fauci purely out of ego, with no concern for the health and welfare of citizens," she concluded.

In the Sydney Morning Herald, Matthew Knott, stated that slamming Fauci is exactly the type of undisciplined behaviour Republican strategists would want Trump to avoid in the closing days of the campaign. "There's no political benefit to be gained from attacking a highly respected and popular national figure," Knott rightly pointed out.

Knott added that getting into a spat with Fauci also elevates the prominence of the coronavirus, which is bad news for Trump, as polls consistently show that six in 10 Americans disapprove of the way Trump has handled the coronavirus.

"Trump's attacks on Fauci are more psychological than political, they represent Trump's need to assert dominance against anyone he perceives as a threat. Fauci has continued to speak frankly throughout the pandemic, even if it's not what Trump wants to hear," Knott added.

Knott concludes that going after a well-liked figure such as Fauci is simply about Trump nursing a personal grudge.

Mark Shanahan wrote in the Boston Globe, "It would seem unwise, picking this fight with Fauci — so close to Election Day — instead of using the waning days of his teetering reelection campaign to, say, reassure worried voters, especially seniors terrified of being infected... but there’s always a Trumpian logic to these Twitter explosions."

Shanahan added that while the president was angry, he could have said nothing. But if we’ve learned anything about the current occupant of the White House, it’s that he can’t help himself, he’s incapable of saying nothing, Shanahan added.

"As an anxious nation turns its eyes to Trump, he’s busy looking elsewhere, for someone — anyone — he can blame for the raging pandemic tanking his prospects for a second term. Good luck with that. Fauci, it would seem, is not your man," Shanahan concluded.

With inputs from agencies



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2TblTyz
via IFTTT

Wednesday, 14 October 2020

NBC faces blowback over scheduling Donald Trump town hall at same time as Joe Biden event on ABC

NBC was battered with criticism on Wednesday after it announced plans for a Thursday town hall event with President Donald Trump to air opposite an already-scheduled ABC forum with his Democratic opponent, Joe Biden.

Top Democrats, media pundits, and many journalists inside NBC and MSNBC were taken aback by the network’s choice of the 8 pm Eastern time slot (5.30 am IST), which will make it impossible for Americans to watch both candidates live.

“The point of a news organisation is to serve the public,” Vivian Schiller, a former executive at NBC, Twitter and National Public Radio, wrote on Twitter. “This is the opposite.”

Trump and Biden were originally scheduled to face off on Thursday in Miami at a formal debate — until last week, when Trump abruptly withdrew after the Commission on Presidential Debates decided to stage the event virtually over concerns that Trump could still be contagious with the coronavirus.

Biden quickly arranged his own telecast with ABC, prompting Trump’s campaign to seek its own event that evening. After a lengthy negotiation — NBC wanted proof that the president would not pose a health risk, which it received only on Tuesday — the network announced its plans Wednesday morning.

Several people familiar with internal discussions described the network’s thinking, requesting anonymity to share private conversations.

Trump’s town hall event was patterned after a similar Biden forum that NBC had hosted on 5 October, the people said. It will be held at the same outdoor Miami venue, with the same format that features questions from Florida voters — and the same 8 pm time slot.

But given the conflict with Biden’s event on ABC, why not simply start Trump after the former vice president finishes?

NBC officials argued internally that such a move could be problematic because many more American households watch television later in the evening. In theory, they argued, starting the event at 9 or 10 pm Eastern would grant Trump access to a larger potential live audience than Biden had for his NBC event on 5 October.

So why not hold the event on a different night? NBC executives have insisted that the date was their choice, the people said, and that Thursday fit the president’s schedule: Because of the now-cancelled second debate, Trump’s evening was free.

It was unclear if the Trump campaign would have accommodated a request by NBC to move the event to a different day. The president is trailing in many national polls and is eager for opportunities to make his case to a sizable audience. NBC’s publicists declined to comment.

Numerous staff members at NBC and MSNBC expressed private dismay on Wednesday at their leaders’ decision. One former NBC News executive, Mark Lukasiewicz, who produced political conventions and candidate forums for the network, wrote on Twitter, “This is a bad result for American voters, who should not be forced to choose which to watch.”

In 2020, many Americans prefer to watch television programmes at their own pace, using DVRs and online streams. Viewers who want to see what both Biden and Trump have to say on Thursday will have plenty of options to do so.

But presidential events have a unique draw, particularly at the height of the campaign: Biden and Trump’s first debate in Cleveland last month drew 73 million viewers. Neither town hall on Thursday is likely to come close to those numbers, given that formal debates air simultaneously across a dozen or more networks.

Still, by scheduling Trump against Biden, NBC may end up providing the president with one of his preferred talking points: The president is almost certain to score a higher Nielsen rating than Biden, since the event will also air on NBC’s sibling cable channels, MSNBC and CNBC.

Whether exposure to a mass audience is politically useful for Trump is also an open question: He received poor marks for his performance at last month’s debate.

NBC officials had held back on confirming the Trump event until they had credible evidence that the president would not pose a safety risk to other participants — including network crew members, the Florida voters on hand to ask questions, and the moderator, Savannah Guthrie of the Today show. Network management said it was not comfortable relying solely on the word of the White House physician, Dr Sean P Conley.

On Wednesday, NBC proffered a statement from Dr Clifford Lane, a clinical director at the National Institutes of Health. Lane said he and Dr Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, had reviewed medical data about Trump’s condition, including a PCR test that the NIH analysed on Tuesday. (A PCR test is a widely used virus diagnostic that is considered more reliable than a rapid antigen test.)

Lane concluded “with a high degree of confidence” that the president was “not shedding infectious virus,” NBC said.

The network did not explicitly say that Trump had received a negative result from the PCR test.

In an interview on Wednesday, Fauci said that he and Lane had reviewed the PCR result, as well as data from viral cultures and multiple negative tests on a rapid antigen test, Abbott’s BinaxNOW.

Fauci said he and Lane had corresponded with Conley, who provided all of the information that they assessed. “We were just given the data and we made a determination from the data,” Fauci said.

Combined with the fact that Trump was more than 10 days out from the onset of symptoms, Fauci said, “We can say with a high degree of confidence that he is not transmissible.”

Trump’s PCR test had a cycle threshold — a proxy for viral load — of 34.3, Fauci said. According to data provided by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, people with a threshold over 33 carry little to no live virus.

The NBC town hall event will be held outdoors at the Pérez Art Museum in Miami, and audience members will be required to wear masks. The network said that Guthrie and Trump would be seated at least 12 feet apart.

Michael M Grynbaum c.2020 The New York Times Company



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3lNdJIW
via IFTTT

Tuesday, 13 October 2020

China, Russia, Cuba get seats on UN Human Rights Council despite opposition over abysmal records; Saudi Arabia misses out

United Nations: China, Russia and Cuba won seats on the UN’s premiere human rights body on Tuesday despite opposition from activist groups over their abysmal human rights records, but another target, Saudi Arabia, lost.

Russia and Cuba were running unopposed, but China and Saudi Arabia were in a five-way race in the only contested race for seats on the Human Rights Council.

In secret-ballot voting in the 193-member UN General Assembly on that race, Pakistan received 169 votes, Uzbekistan 164, Nepal 150, China 139 and Saudi Arabia just 90 votes.

Despite announced reform plans by Saudi Arabia, Human Rights Watch and others strongly opposed its candidacy saying the Middle East nation continues to target human rights defenders, dissidents and women’s rights activists and has demonstrated little accountability for past abuses, including the killing of Washington Post columnist and Saudi critic Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul two years ago.

Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of Democracy for the Arab World Now, the organisation founded by Khashoggi, said despite hundreds of millions of dollars spent by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin on public relations “to cover his grotesque abuses, the international community just isn’t buying it.”

“Unless Saudi Arabia undertakes dramatic reforms to release political prisoners, end its disastrous war in Yemen and allow its citizens meaningful political participation, it will remain a global pariah,” Whitson said.

Under the Human Rights Council’s rules, seats are allocated to regions to ensure geographical representation.

Except for the Asia-Pacific contest, the election of 15 members to the 47-member Human Rights Council was all but decided in advance because all the other regional groups had uncontested slates.

Four countries won four Africa seats: Ivory Coast, Malawi, Gabon and Senegal. Russia and Ukraine won the two East European seats. In the Latin American and Caribbean group, Mexico, Cuba and Bolivia won the three open seats. And Britain and France won the two seats for the Western European and others group.

“Saudi Arabia’s failure to win a seat on the Human Rights Council is a welcome reminder of the need for more competition in UN elections," Human Rights Watch's UN director, Louis Charbonneau, said after the results were announced,

“Had there been additional candidates, China, Cuba and Russia might have lost too," he said. “But the addition of these undeserving countries won’t prevent the council from shining a light on abuses and speaking up for victims. In fact, by being on the council, these abusers will be directly in the spotlight.”

Charbonneau earlier criticised UN member states, including Western nations, saying: “They don’t want competition. Essentially these are backroom deals that are worked out among the regional groups.”

Last week, a coalition of human rights groups from Europe, the United States and Canada called on UN member states to oppose the election of China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Pakistan and Uzbekistan, saying their human rights records make them “unqualified.”

“Electing these dictatorships as UN judges on human rights is like making a gang of arsonists into the fire brigade,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch.

The Geneva-based rights organisation published a 30-page joint report with the Human Rights Foundation and the Raoul Wallenberg Center for Human Rights evaluating candidates for council seats. The report lists Bolivia, Ivory Coast, Nepal, Malawi, Mexico, Senegal and Ukraine — all winners — as having “questionable” credentials due to problematic human rights and UN voting records that need improvement. It gave “qualified” ratings only to the United Kingdom and France.

Human Rights Watch pointed to an unprecedented call by 50 UN experts on 26 June for “decisive measures to protect fundamental freedoms in China,” warning about its mass rights violations in Hong Kong and Tibet and against ethnic Uighurs in the Chinese province of Xinjiang as well as attacks on rights defenders, journalists, lawyers and government critics. Their call was echoed by over 400 civil society groups from more than 60 countries.

Of the four winners of seats in the Asia-Pacific group, China got the lowest vote.

The rights group said Russia’s military operations with the Syrian government “have deliberately or indiscriminately killed civilians and destroyed hospitals and other protected civilian infrastructure in violation of international humanitarian law,” and noted Russia’s veto of UN Security Council resolutions on Syria, including blocking Damascus’ referral to the International Criminal Court.

The Geneva-based Human Rights Council can spotlight abuses and has special monitors watching certain countries and issues. It also periodically reviews human rights in every UN member country.

Created in 2006 to replace a commission discredited because of some members’ poor rights records, the new council soon came to face similar criticism, including that rights abusers sought seats to protect themselves and their allies.

The United States announced its withdrawal from the council in June 2018 partly because it considered the body a forum for hypocrisy about human rights, though also because Washington says the council is anti-Israel.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Tuesday’s election of China, Russia and Cuba and last year’s election of Venezuela - “countries with abhorrent human rights records” - further validate the US withdrawal from the council. He said the US has taken its own actions to punish “human rights abusers in Xinjiang, Myanmar, Iran, and elsewhere.”

Israel’s UN Ambassador Gilad Erdan called on all democracies on the council “to immediately resign from this shameful and anti-Semitic body.”

Human Rights Council spokesman Rolando Gomez said when the newly elected members start their three-year terms in January, 119 of the 193 UN member States will have served on the council, reflecting its diversity and giving the council “legitimacy when speaking out on human rights violations in all countries.”

“If a State thinks they can conceal the human rights violations they may have committed, or escape criticism by sitting on the Human Rights Council, they are greatly mistaken," Gomez said.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2GZ3rq9
via IFTTT

World Bank approves $12 bn for COVID-19 vaccine financing plan, treatment in developing countries

Washington: The World Bank said Tuesday that it approved $12 billion for developing countries to finance the purchase and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, tests and treatment.

The financing "aims to support vaccination of up to a billion people," the bank said in a statement.

The money is part of an overall World Bank Group (WBG) package of up to $160 billion through June 2021 designed to help developing countries battle the novel coronavirus pandemic.

"This financing package helps signal to the research and pharmaceutical industry that citizens in developing countries also need access to safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines," the statement read.

"It will also provide financing and technical support so that developing countries can prepare for deploying vaccines at scale, in coordination with international partners."

Access to safe and effective vaccines "and strengthened delivery systems is key to alter the course of the pandemic and help countries experiencing catastrophic economic and fiscal impacts move toward a resilient recovery," World Bank Group President David Malpass said in the statement.

The financing "will also support countries to access to COVID-19 tests and treatments, and expand immunization capacity to help health systems deploy the vaccines effectively," the statement added.

The financing approval was expected as Malpass had announced the project in late September.

While vaccines have yet to appear on the market, Malpass noted in an interview with the French daily Le Figaro that it was necessary to prepare because of the complicated vaccine distribution process.

The Bank's approach, according to the statement, draws on its "significant expertise in supporting large scale immunization programs for vaccine preventable diseases, as well as public health programs to tackle infectious diseases such as HIV, tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases."



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/33VC60Q
via IFTTT

While Boris Johnson sinks in response to COVID-19, Rishi Sunak continues to rise

London: Breakfast starts at 8 am and guests help themselves to croissants and juice before the sleek figure of Rishi Sunak, the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, works his way around the crowded, oak-panelled dining room of his official London home, No 11 Downing Street.

For Sunak, meetings with groups of Conservative Party lawmakers help him reach out and forge a network of support in Parliament. For the lawmakers, it’s a chance to meet someone many expect to one day move next door — to No 10, the prime minister’s home.

Sunak was virtually unknown 10 months ago, and his vertiginous rise has surprised almost everyone in British politics — in all likelihood even the man who promoted him, Prime Minister Boris Johnson, whose approval ratings have plummeted during the pandemic.

“Rishi Sunak has the strengths that the prime minister so conspicuously lacks, not only basic competence but a grasp of detail,” said Tim Bale, professor of politics at Queen Mary University of London, “and no one has mounted such an obvious, in your face, social media campaign as Rishi Sunak.”

It seems to be working. A recent poll of party members by the ConservativeHome website placed Sunak, 40, easily top of Cabinet satisfaction ratings, while Johnson was almost bottom of the list.

Contrast that with a survey that Bale conducted in December in which Conservative Party members were asked who should take over were Johnson to step aside.

“Just five out of 1,191 named Rishi Sunak,” he said, “and I’m not sure that all of them spelt his name correctly.”

When he was catapulted into his job in February, after two years as a minister — including six months in the No 2 job at the Treasury — Sunak was firmly in the shadow of Johnson, who had just won a landslide election victory.

But while Johnson has floundered during the coronavirus pandemic, Sunak has been a beacon of calm and competence, intervening swiftly to spend billions of pounds supporting jobs as the economy went into lockdown free fall. With new restrictions coming into force in parts of the country, Sunak has announced new state support for affected areas, and Monday he gave a fluent defence of his latest measures at a media conference alongside Johnson.

Perhaps wisely, given the speculation about his ambitions, Sunak tried to burst his own bubble when the Conservative Party held its recent party conference virtually.

In a surprisingly short speech, he lavished praise on Johnson and warned that uncomfortable economic choices lay ahead. The subliminal message seemed to be: “You might like me a little less when all this cash has to be paid back.”

But right now, they like him a lot, and his appeal among nonpartisan Britons has been burnished through slick social media posts on Instagram and Twitter designed around “Brand Rishi.” Allies insist that Sunak is simply using digital media techniques to communicate more effectively rather than to promote his ambitions.

His posts stand out from the drab detritus of political advertising, though. Often they feature a stylish photograph of the chancellor endorsing a policy with his distinctive signature, rather like a sporting celebrity might promote an expensive fitness accessory.

This was probably not what Johnson expected when he promoted Sunak to take over from Sajid Javid, who resigned as chancellor after refusing to accept curbs on his right to hire his own advisers. Sunak agreed, leading some to speculate that he would be more compliant.

In Britain, the relationship between prime minister and chancellor — although a central pivot of government — is often one of rivalry and tension. So the idea in February was to ensure that there was one centre of power on economic policy: In No 10.

But few prime ministers can afford to fire two chancellors, so Johnson was taking a risk in appointing someone as adept and diligent as Sunak.

Not only is Sunak a smooth communicator, but, with his Indian heritage, he is a walking success story of modern multiracial Britain.

His grandparents, originally from Punjab, arrived in England from British colonial East Africa in the 1960s. As a teenager, he says he suffered racist abuse.

“It stung, I still remember, it’s seared in my memory,” he told the BBC, recounting how he had been abused in a restaurant.

But while Javid, his predecessor, was the son of a bus driver from Pakistan, Sunak’s father was a doctor and his mother ran a pharmacy. Together, they earned enough to send him to an elite private school, Winchester College.

Without that expensive education, Sunak might well still have reached Oxford University (he graduated with top grades). But his schooling seems to have helped instil the confidence and social polish that has allowed him to move effortlessly through the ranks of the Conservative Party.

Before his political career began in earnest, Sunak also earned an MBA at Stanford University, where he met his future wife, Akshata Murthy, a daughter of one of India’s richest men, billionaire Narayana Murthy, co-founder of Infosys, an IT giant.

Sunak worked for Goldman Sachs and two hedge funds before being elected to Parliament in 2015. In the 2016 referendum on European Union membership, he voted to leave.

That decision sped his promotion through the ranks, although some hard-line Brexit supporters say that they suspect it was a tactical move and that they believe he is pressing Johnson to strike a trade deal with the European Union.

One of Sunak’s few political vulnerabilities is his wealth. There was barbed commentary when he was photographed with a $235 “smart mug” that keeps coffee or tea at a precise drinking temperature for up to three hours and when he described working out on an exercise bike that retails at around 10 times that amount.

But Sunak is generally good at avoiding gaffes and is well plugged into the media world. He was the best man at the wedding of a school friend, James Forsyth, and Allegra Stratton. Forsyth is the political editor of the Spectator, a conservative weekly, and Stratton is a former journalist and broadcaster. She is currently employed by Sunak as an advisor but is expected to become the spokeswoman for Johnson, in which capacity she will conduct televised news conferences.

Sunak’s allies see this as an illustration of the close ties between the Downing Street neighbours. But, while relations appear good at the moment, tensions have surfaced. Last month Sunak moved to protect the economy by fighting off many lockdown restrictions suggested by scientists advising the government.

Those differences are likely to grow.

Some day, Britain will have to start to repay its huge pile of debt. Johnson neither wants to return to austerity nor to raise taxes, but some decision cannot be delayed indefinitely.

Sophia Gaston, director of the British Foreign Policy Group and a fellow at the London School of Economics, said, “The chancellor has been in the privileged position of playing Father Christmas throughout the pandemic, one of the few politicians bearing gifts rather than taking them away.”

“Tax rises are on the horizon,” she added, “and he will soon have to take tough decisions about which industries to prop up and which parts of the electorate to shield from the worst of the pandemic’s economic hit.”

Should unemployment rise to levels not seen since the 1980s, Sunak would surely take at least some of the blame.

But, Gaston noted, he has already shown himself to be an outstanding communicator and a consultative and pragmatic leader.

“If his branding can remain strong during the next six months of economic doom and gloom, there can be no limits on the scope of his political ambitions,” she said.

So far, Sunak has successfully distanced himself from the questions over competence that have gathered around Johnson and much of his Cabinet.

He has also avoided the culture wars regularly stirred by some of Johnson’s pugilistic, pro-Brexit advisors, who seem never happier than when attacking the pillars of the establishment.

That leaves him neatly positioned as an exponent of a more competent and inclusive type of politics, an enticing package should a vacancy arise next door in Downing Street.

“In his position, you can’t afford to look too eager,” said Bale, the professor at Queen Mary. “But, on the other hand, you can’t afford to miss your moment when it comes.”

Stephen Castle c.2020 The New York Times Company



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3iQFDSk
via IFTTT

Friday, 9 October 2020

Armenia, Azerbaijan agree on ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh region after Russia hosts peace talks

Moscow: With Russia's mediation, Armenia and Azerbaijan agreed to a cease-fire in Nagorno-Karabakh starting at noon Saturday following two weeks of heavy fighting that marked the worst outbreak of hostilities in the separatist region in a quarter-century.

The countries' foreign ministers said in a statement that the truce is intended to exchange prisoners and recover the dead, adding that specific details will be agreed on later.

The announcement followed 10 hours of talks in Moscow sponsored by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who read the statement. It stipulated that the cease-fire should pave the way for talks on settling the conflict.

If the truce holds, it would mark a major diplomatic coup for Russia that has a security pact with Armenia but also cultivated warm ties with Azerbaijan.

The latest outburst of fighting between Azerbaijani and Armenian forces began 27 September and left hundreds of people dead in the biggest escalation of the decades-old conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh since a separatist war there ended in 1994. The region lies in Azerbaijan but has been under control of ethnic Armenian forces backed by Armenia.

The talks between the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan were held on invitation from Russian President Vladimir Putin, who brokered the cease-fire in a series of calls with President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian.

Armenia said it was open to a cease-fire, while Azerbaijan previously had made a potential truce conditional on the Armenian forces’ withdrawal from Nagorno-Karabakh, arguing that the failure of international efforts to negotiate a political settlement left it no other choice but to resort to force.

Russia has co-sponsored peace talks on Nagorno-Karabakh together with the United States and France as co-chairs of the so-called Minsk Group, which is working under the auspices of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

Speaking in an address to the nation Friday hours before the cease-fire deal was reached, the Azerbaijani president insisted on his country's right to reclaim its territory by force after nearly three decades of international talks that "haven't yielded an inch of progress."

"Mediators and leaders of some international organizations have stated that there is no military solution to the conflict," Aliyev said. "I have disagreed with the thesis, and I have been right. The conflict is now being settled by military means and political means will come next."

The current escalation marked the first time that Azerbaijan's ally Turkey took a high profile in the conflict, offering strong political support. Over the past few years, Turkey provided Azerbaijan with state-of-the-art weapons, including drones and rocket systems that helped the Azerbaijani military outgun the Nagorno-Karabakh separatist forces in the latest fighting.

Armenian officials say Turkey is involved in the conflict and is sending Syrian mercenaries to fight on Azerbaijan's side. Turkey has denied deploying combatants to the region, but a Syrian war monitor and three Syria-based opposition activists have confirmed that Turkey has sent hundreds of Syrian opposition fighters to fight in Nagorno-Karabakh.

In an interview with CNN Arabic aired Thursday, Azerbaijan’s president admitted that Turkish F-16 fighter jets have stayed on in Azerbaijan weeks after a joint military exercise, but insisted that they have remained grounded. Armenian officials had earlier claimed that a Turkish F-16 shot down an Armenian warplane, a claim that both Turkey and Azerbaijan have denied.

Turkey's involvement in the conflict raised painful memories in Armenia, where an estimated 1.5 million died in massacres, deportations and forced marches that began in 1915 as Ottoman officials worried that the Christian Armenians would side with Russia, its enemy in World War I.

The event is widely viewed by historians as genocide. Turkey denies the deaths constituted genocide, saying the toll has been inflated and that those killed were victims of civil war and unrest.

Turkey's high profile in the conflict worried Russia, which has a military base in Armenia. The two countries are linked by a security treaty obliging Moscow to offer support to its ally if it comes under aggression.

At the same time, Russia has sought to maintain strong economic and political ties with oil-rich Azerbaijan and ward off Turkey's attempt to increase its influence in the South Caucasus without ruining its delicate relations with Ankara.

Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan have negotiated a series of deals to coordinate their conflicting interests in Syria and Libya and expanded their economic ties. Last year, NATO member Turkey took the delivery of the Russian S-400 air defense missiles, a move that angered Washington.

A cease-fire in Nagorno-Karabakh would allow the Kremlin to stem Turkey's bid to expand its clout in Russia's backyard without ruining its strategic relationship with Ankara.

While Turkey has aspired to join the Minsk Group talks as a co-chair, the statement issued by Armenia and Azerbaijan contained their pledge to maintain the current format of the peace talks.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3lwC31v
via IFTTT

US election 2020: Second presidential debate cancelled after Donald Trump refuses to participate in virtual format

Washington: The Commission on Presidential Debates said Friday it has cancelled next week's showdown between Donald Trump and his challenger Joe Biden, after the president said he would not participate in a virtual format.

"Each (candidate) now has announced alternate plans for that date," the commission said in a statement, adding "it is now apparent there will be no debate on 15 October."

The move leaves just one more debate on the schedule - 22 October in Nashville, Tennessee - before the 3 November election.

Debates have been a feature of every US presidential election since 1976, with three debates near the end of a campaign the standard since 2000.

The commission had announced Thursday it was converting the 15 October town hall debate to a virtual affair out of an abundance of caution because Trump had tested positive for the coronavirus.

But the president, who has been eager to return to the campaign trail and hold live events, refused to participate in the virtual format and sought unsuccessfully to return it to an in-person debate.

Biden had said earlier this week he would not debate Trump in person if he still had the virus, and his campaign called Trump's refusal to adapt to a virtual format "shameful."

"It's shameful that Donald Trump ducked the only debate in which the voters get to ask the questions - but it's no surprise," Biden spokesman Andrew Bates said.

Trump "doesn't have the guts to answer for his record to voters at the same time as vice president Biden."

The US president meanwhile plans to hold his first live event at the White House since being diagnosed with COVID-19.

All attendees will be told to wear masks they must bring, and will have to submit to a COVID-19 screening (Saturday) morning. This will consist of a temperature check and a brief questionnaire, according to a source familiar with the preparations.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3ltdVNa
via IFTTT

Thursday, 8 October 2020

China joins coronavirus vaccine alliance; signs agreement with GAVI after missing September deadline

Taipei: China, which has four coronavirus vaccine candidates in stage 3 clinical trials, said Friday it is joining the COVID-19 vaccine alliance known as COVAX.

The country signed an agreement with GAVI, the co-leader of the alliance, on Thursday, China's Foreign Ministry said in a statement. Initially, China did not agree to join the alliance, missing the global deadline to join in September.

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said in a statement that “we are taking this concrete step to ensure equitable distribution of vaccines, especially to developing countries, and hope more capable countries will also join and support COVAX.”

It is not yet clear the exact terms of the agreement and how China will contribute. The country's leader Xi Jinping previously said that China would make the vaccine a global public good.

The alliance is designed so that richer countries agree to buy into potential vaccines and help finance access for poorer ones. The Trump administration in the US had declined to join the alliance.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/30QkG3U
via IFTTT

Fire engulfs high-rise apartment complex in South Korea’s Ulsan; at least 88 sustain minor injuries

Seoul: A fire spread up a high-rise apartment building by strong winds in a South Korean port city left scores of people with minor injuries, officials said Friday.

Footage from the scene in Ulsan showed a huge ball of orange flame soaring up the 33-floor building and shooting through the roof as firefighting crews tried to put out the blaze from below.

There were no immediate reports of deaths or serious injuries. Hundreds of residents evacuated as the fire broke out while workers rescued another 77 who had escaped to the roof or other spaces.

South Korea’s Ministry of the Interior and Safety said at least 88 people were treated for minor injuries such as scratches or lightly inhaling smoke.

Officials are investigating the cause of the fire, which they said started at a balcony in one of the lower floors late Thursday and spread up the exterior of the building amid strong winds. The fire was nearly put out as of 9 am Friday.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2SBuyKa
via IFTTT